Downward bias in the association between APOE and Alzheimer’s Disease using prevalent and by-proxy disease sampling in the All of Us Research Program
Abstract
Background
Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias (ADRD) have increased statistical power via larger analysis datasets from biobanks by 1) including non-age-matched controls and prevalent cases, and/or 2) including individuals who report a family history of ADRD as proxy cases. However, these methods have the potential to increase noise and distort genetic associations which are important for genomic-informed prevention and treatment of ADRD. Here, we sought to understand how the effect sizes of genetic associations in ADRD could be sensitive to these methodological choices, usingAPOEgenotypes as an example.
Methods
Participants in theAll of UsResearch Program over the age of 49 at enrollment (n=258,693) were assigned one of four categories: incident ADRD (developed after enrollment inAll of Us), prevalent ADRD (present on enrollment), proxy ADRD (participant noted a family history of ADRD), and control (no history or diagnosis of ADRD). Dementia diagnoses were determined using available Electronic Health Records (EHR) andAPOEgenotype was determined using whole-genome sequencing. Effect sizes for the associations betweenAPOErisk alleles and ADRD diagnoses were compared using polychotomous logistic regression.
Results
The mean age of the cohort was 67±10 years, and it was 58% female; 63% clustered predominantly with European genetic reference populations. Among the participants, 3,107 (1.2%) had prevalent ADRD, 301 (0.1%) had incident ADRD, and 19,910 (7.7%) reported a family history of ADRD (proxy ADRD). Both prevalent and proxy ADRD had attenuated associations withAPOEgenotype compared to incident ADRD. The adjusted generalized ratio (95% CI) (AGR) for incident ADRD forAPOEε4 heterozygotes was 2.95 (2.31-3.74) compared to 2.10 (1.96-2.24) and 1.42 (1.32-1.55) for proxy and prevalent ADRD, respectively. ForAPOEε4 homozygotes, the effect sizes were even more different. Furthermore,APOEassociation effect sizes increased when restricting the control (no ADRD) group to older age brackets.
Conclusions
Our study highlights how genetic associations with ADRD can be sensitive to how cases are defined in biobanks likeAll of Us, with effect sizes downwardly biased when using prevalent or by-proxy cases compared to incident cases.
Related articles
Related articles are currently not available for this article.