Compatibility and Bias Between Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter and Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Ultrasound-Based Hepatic Steatosis Assessment
Abstract
Purpose
To develop a regression model for estimating the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) from ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP)-attenuation coefficient (AC) and to evaluate the agreement and interchangeability between the two measurements in a clinical setting.
Methods
This retrospective observational study included 85 patients who underwent both UGAP and CAP measurements. UGAP-AC values were converted to dB/m to match CAP units. Pearson’s correlation and linear regression analyses were performed to derive a prediction formula. Bland–Altman analysis and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used to assess fixed and proportional biases and the influence of body mass index (BMI).
Results
UGAP-AC and CAP showed a strong correlation (r= 0.947,p< 0.0001). The regression equation was: CAP (dB/m) = 371.5 × UGAP-AC (dB/cm/MHz) + 12.3 (R2= 0.8946). Bland–Altman analysis revealed a fixed bias of 28.6 dB/m and a BMI-dependent proportional bias. However, no significant proportional bias was observed within the clinically relevant CAP range (228–300 dB/m).
Conclusion
UGAP-AC can reliably estimate CAP using a simple regression formula. Although systematic biases exist, their clinical impact appears limited, supporting the interchangeable use of UGAP and CAP in routine practice.
Related articles
Related articles are currently not available for this article.